Ex-Wilmot employee looks to discrimination claim

By Ray Carbone

WILMOT – One of the four employees who recently resigned from the town’s employ said that she planned to file a complaint with the NH Commission on Human Rights Commission over alleged health-related discrimination.

In her resignation letter submitted to the board of selectmen dated Aug. 22, Nicole (Nikki) Arsenault, who served as an administrative assistant and land/property use assistant, wrote that she was in the process of submitting a discrimination complaint with the state agency. She said it was related to how she felt she was treated by Nancy Bates, the town administrator, after missing time due to an illness.

‘There is bullying, gossiping, gaslighting, abuse of power and double standards enforcing town policy going on in this office…’

Nicole Arsenault, former town employee

“I’ve missed several days of work over the past month,” the letter reads. “I have become aware that I am being treated differently due to the fact that Ms. Bates is ‘angry’ with me when I miss work due to illness.”

In a note attached to the letter, Arsenault recorded discussing the issue in an April meeting with Bates. At that time, the assistant wrote, Bates admitted to being angry about the missed hours, adding that it was “not right, but that’s how she (Bates) felt.”

Arsenault’s letter stated that she was resigning because she’d recently approached the town administrator again about the perceived problem, but Bates denied ever admitted that she was angry.

“It was my mistake to not speak up sooner for myself and for those around me, to demand that inappropriate behavior be stopped,” Arsenault wrote to the three-member board of selectmen.

“There is bullying, gossiping, gaslighting, abuse of power and double standards enforcing town policy going on in this office by the town administrator and it is unacceptable,” she added.

At the September 5 selectmen’s meeting, Rhonda Gauthier, the long-time town clerk/tax collector, and her assistant, Kathy LaVallee, announced that they were resigning their positions effective Dec. 31. In her resignation letter to the board, Gauthier wrote that Bates “fired or bullied all employees.”

But Nick Brodich, chairman of the selectmen, has said that although the board was aware of tensions between Gauthier and Bates, it didn’t feel that they were severe enough to take action.

In a response letter to Gauthier, the selectmen criticized her brief appearance at the Sept. 5 meeting as lacking “substance.” It also said that the charges directed at both Bates and the board (for allegedly ignoring ongoing problems) were “serious and hurtful,” and that, by refusing to meet with the board and Bates, Gauthier’s actions were “as disrespectful as cowardly… (and) completely unbecoming an elected town official.”

Late last week, Gauthier said, “I really want to move on,” adding that “Nancy (Bates) did many little things over a period of time… (but) I resigned because I was tired of seeing it happen to other and nothing being said or done about it. I did not want to be part of that environment any longer.”

This story first appeared in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in Sutton, New Hampshire, on Tuesday, December 4, 2018.

 

Advertisements

Wave of resignations hit small NH town

By Ray Carbone

WILMOT – Selectmen are dealing with resignations from four town hall employees in recent weeks, as well as a charge that they ignored an ongoing bullying problem between two workers.

On Friday, Nick Brodich, the chairman of the board of selectmen, said that Rhonda Gauthier, the departing town clerk/tax collector, claims that Nancy Bates, who recently resigned her position as town administrator, bullied her. Gauthier also says that the selectmen were aware of the situation but did nothing to resolve it, according to Brodich.

“The board of selectmen took serious issue with both of those accusations,” he said. “Especially that we were, to use her words, ‘sweeping things under the rug.’”

Sometime after the meeting, (Nancy) Bates submitted her own letter of resignation. She’s leaving her post as town administrator on December 7.

Brodich said that the selectmen were aware of some ongoing low-level tensions between Gauthier and Bates for the past year or two.

“It never really got to the point where (Gauthier) ever reached out to us, ever expressed any concerns,” he said. “It was not, in any way, brought to our attention.”

On September 5, the selectmen held their regular meeting in the town offices. As it was starting, Gauthier entered the room and handed her resignation letter and a packet of information to the selectmen and others attending the meeting. She then wished the selectmen a pleasant evening and left. Brodich said that he called out to her but the town clerk/tax collector apparently left the building quickly.

Neither the letter nor the packet was available at press time, but Brodich said they included the claims against Bates and the three-member board, and that Gauthier was planning to leave her position on Dec. 31.

“In her letter, she referenced the culture of bullying by (Bates) and then included a reference that the board of selectmen knew about it, that she’d been trying to tell the board of selectmen and that we weren’t hearing it,” Brodich said.

At Gauthier’s departure from the September 5 meeting, Brodich asked her assistant, Kathy LaVallee, the deputy town clerk/tax collector, if she was also planning to leave the town’s employ. LaVallee said she would be handing in her resignation with the same departure date, December 31.

According to the meeting minutes, Brodich then turned to Nikki Arsenault, an administrative and land use assistant for the town. Arsenault had resigned several weeks earlier shortly before a board meeting, effective immediately, and her resignation letter has not been made public.

The chairman asked Arsenault if she wanted to make any comment in light of Gauthier’s sudden departure. Arsenault said she’d hoped that “everyone could sit down and talk about this,” according to the minutes.

Brodich then declined a request to read Arsenault’s resignation letter into the public record. (There may be legal restrictions if it’s considered part of an employee’s personal file.)

Sometime after the meeting, Bates submitted her own letter of resignation. She’s leaving her post as town administrator on December 7, Brodich said.

At the next selectmen’s meeting on September 13, the board read an open letter that they wrote to Gauthier, saying that her actions at the previous meeting “though not lacking drama… lacked substance.”

“The accusations you have leveled against Town Administrator Bates are extremely serious and hurtful,” it reads. “The accusations you have leveled against the board of selectmen being derelict in its duties are likewise grave. To make such accusations in written correspondence and then refuse to meet with the people you have accused is as disrespectful as it is cowardly, and it is completely unbecoming an elected town official.”

Brodich reiterated the board’s willingness to meet with Gauthier and others who may have an interest in the situation.

On Friday, Brodich said he doubted Gauthier’s claim that Bates was a bully. “Anyone who knows Nancy Bates would laugh at loud at the concept of her bullying anyone,” he said. “She’s about a quiet and mild a person as you’ll find.”

Gautier and LaVallee have worked for the town for a decade or more, and Bates has been with the town for more than six years, according to Brodich. Arsenault is a newer employee, Brodich added.

Last week, Bates refused to comment on the situation. Attempts to reach Gauthier and Arsenault were unsuccessful, and LaVallee made no comment.

The town is now looking for a new town administrator and a new town clerk/tax collector.

This story first appeared in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in Sutton, New Hampshire, on Tuesday, November 30, 2018.

Selectman fires back at former town employee

By Ray Carbone

WARNER – The chairman of the town’s board of selectman is disputing recent remarks made by a former town clerk who claimed that an inhospitable work environment exists among town employees.

Kimberley Brown Edelmann, who became chairman of the three-person board at the beginning of the year, made her remarks at the board’s Oct. 24 meeting in the town hall. She said that critical remarks made by Judy Newman-Rogers, the long-time clerk who resigned several weeks ago, were related to an employee-related issue that dated back to 2015. “Apparently the select boards (past and current) did not take the action the town clerk wanted,” the chairman said.

Brown Edelmann also addressed management-related issues, noting that ‘documentation is critical’ whenever a manager has a ‘problem employee.’

Brown Edelmann directly refuted Newman-Rogers’s charge that town hall has developed a “hostile, unpleasant and dysfunctional environment” for employees in recent years.

“In my experience (working at two temporary town positions), I can honestly say that I found everyone in the town hall staff, without exception, to be welcoming, helpful, and always aiming to do a good job serving the Town of Warner and its citizens,” she said. “I enjoyed the work experiences so much, I recommended the Warner Town Hall as a potential place of employment to two of my friends. I would never have done that if I thought it was an unpleasant work environment.”

In early October, Newman-Rogers announced her resignation at a board meeting. In a letter addressed to the selectmen and read aloud, she said that “requests for resolution to (problem) situations made known to the town administrator (i.e., Jim Bingham) and the board of selectmen have gone unaddressed.

“Previous administrative traits of transparency, trust, honesty, lawfulness, communication, integrity, accountability and equal application of policy and procedure have been supplanted with deflection, delay, denial, disrespect, dismissals, discrimination and blatant division of personnel,” according to Newman-Roger.

She later told the InterTown Record that she believed that “the town administrator (Bingham) is the problem.”

At the Oct. 24 meeting, Brown Edelmann said that shortly after she took office in 2017, Newman-Rogers handed her an envelope, stating that the contents contained information about a situation dating back to 2015 and that “previous select boards had failed to address… She said she hoped I would look into and take appropriate action,” the chairman recounted.

“As a new selectman, I was given access to the full set of documents regarding the issue,” Brown Edelmann continued. “ I learned that an investigation was done. I learned what legal advice was given. I read what action was taken. And, from what I could see, the issue was closed.

“I will say no more on that subject,” she said.

Brown Edelmann then addressed management-related issues, noting that “documentation is critical” whenever a manager has a “problem employee.”

“Our town administrator (Bingham) was hired in 2013,” the chairman said. “He has not had any performance reviews. He has received verbal feedback, both complimentary and in the form of constructive criticism. But no formal appraisals. He has received wage increases and his contract has been renewed.”

Brown Edelmann then offered her personal thanks to Bingham. “I see the work you do,” she told him. “I’m impressed at the sheer volume and variety of issues and problems you address in your daily work. I appreciate your integrity and your calm management style. And of course, I’m thankful that you keep the select board focused on the work we should be doing.”

Neither Clyde Carson nor John Dabuliewicz, the other selectmen, made any remarks related to their chairman’s statement or to Newman-Rogers’ resignation.

Late last week, Newman-Rogers responded to Brown Edelmann’s statement. She said that the chairman may not have seen any hostility when she was working in town hall because, as a selectman, she’s unwittingly supporting it.

The former employee also said that the current and past boards have taken actions that are inappropriate and, in some cases, illegal. “The selectmen are ignorant and so is town administrator (Bingham), who is supposed to be guiding them,” she charged.

“What’s going on there, it has to stop,” Newman-Rogers concluded.

This story first appeared in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in Sutton, New Hampshire on November 6, 2018.

Public trust is central to new Sunapee access legal appeal

By Ray Carbone

NEWBURY – A group of sports enthusiasts’ organizations and interested private citizens have filed a new appeal to the state’s decision to deny a wetlands building permit that would have allowed the construction of a public boat access facility on Lake Sunapee.

In papers submitted to the Sullivan County Superior Court in Newport on Oct. 10, William Howard Dunn, the attorney representing the groups, reaches back to the English common law that is the basis for the American judicial system and even ancient Roman law.

Those systems support the idea that some properties – like New Hampshire’s lakes – are held in a “pubic trust” by the state government. “(As) stewards of public waters, the state safeguards the right to use and enjoy public waters,” he quotes from a previous case; Dunn also notes state statues that direct the state to “control the use of public waters and the adjacent shoreline for the greatest public benefit.”

The attorney quotes from a 60-year-old Gilmanton lawsuit… and from  a California case that found that members of the public ‘have standing to sue to protect the public trust.’

The issue of public access to Sunapee has been debated for more than 20 years. For some time, the state ‘s department of environmental services (DES) and its fish and game departments sought to build a facility to comply with the legal mandate that reasonable access be available to everyone. In 1990 the state purchased the former Wild Goose campground in Newbury and developed plans to construct a facility there.

But legal challenges from both the town and the Lake Sunapee Protective Association delayed the project for years. The opponents say there is sufficient public access to the lake (although not a state-owned/operated facility), and that dangerous traffic problems on Rte. 103 would result from using the Wild Goose land.

After years of administrative, legislative and court-related wrangling, it looked like the Wild Goose site would be developed. Then Gov. Chris Sununu announced last year that he was pulling the plug on the project because it had lingered unfinished for so long, causing widespread discord in the community. The move was opposed by the NH fish and game department but, not long afterwards, the NH Department of Environmental Services (DES) denied a request from fish and game official to extend it wetlands building permit for the site; for years, the five-year building allowance had been approved several times previously.

The local sport organizations (including the Sullivan County Sportsmen, the NH Bass Federation and the Mountain View Gun Club) joined with Gary Clark, author of The New Hampshire Fishing Guide, and others asking the DES to reconsider its ruling. But an officer with the DES’s wetlands board dismissed their appeal, stating that the groups lacked legal standing to question the decision.

Last August, Dunn filed the sports groups’ initial request, asking the court to overturn the state’s actions and force it to move ahead with building a public access facility on the Wild Goose land. At that time, he argued principally that the state had acted incorrectly and in opposition to its own legal responsibilities, bowing to political pressure.

In his latest filing, Dunn focuses more on the state’s actions based on long-standing legal precedents, as well as its own laws and regulations.

“By law, the nature of these things (that) are common to mankind – the air, running water, the sea and consequently the shores of the sea” are part of the public trust, he writes, quoting from a lawsuit filed by the National Audubon Society in California in 1983.

“This rule, that such land are held by the state in trust for the public at large applies to all states, as it was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court,” Dunn adds. “New Hampshire came to hold the public trust in its waters and shoreline when it joined the union” (in 1776).

The attorney also quotes from a 60-year-old lawsuit filed in Gilmanton to illustrate that New Hampshire courts have recognized that common law rights are applicable to “private individuals.” The California case also found that members of the public “have standing to sue to protect the public trust.”

“The denial of the (wetlands building) extension is a breach of trust by the public trust,” Dunn concludes. “By refusing to grant the wetlands permit, the (state) has violated its own duty under, not just under (state) law but also under common law under the public trust doctrine.”

The legal filing asks the court to order the DES to grant the fish and game’s wetlands building permit extension to August 28, 2022, and to allow the sportsmen organizations to continue to be considered in future actions under the “public trust” doctrine.

In response, DES’s legal team did not object to the new filing, but it argued that the case had already been decided. In addition, the group said that it would appeal the court’s decision if the ruling goes against the agency.

At this time, there’s no indication when the court will issue its final ruling.

This story originally ran in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in Sutton, New Hampshire, on Tuesday, October 23, 2018.

 

 

Sutton fire department addition delayed

By Ray Carbone

SUTTON – Plans to build an $800,000 addition to the town’s North Road fire station have been put on hold, according to Cory Cochran, chief of the fire department.

Late last week, Cochran said that the board of selectmen has directed the fire department building committee to reach out to an architectural engineering firm to rework the group’s original specifications.

“We put them out for bids (from construction companies) in the spring, and ended up with three proposals,” the chief explained. “We noticed that our bid specs didn’t work, they weren’t detailed enough.”

Proposed construction costs ranged from $1.4-million to $700,000. “We rejected them because of inconsistencies, so it’s back to the drawing table,” the chief said.

During the summer, the selectmen decided to get an architectural-engineering firm involved, Cochran reported. The chief later held a building site visit with Kelly Gale of KLG Architecture of Webster to discuss reworking the architectural/engineering plans.

 Cochran admitted that the delay could prove costly for the town and the department, 

 

The status of the project was scheduled to be addressed at the selectmen’s meeting on Monday, September 10. Cochran admitted that the delay could prove costly for the town and the department,

One town official said it was likely that the addition project, which was overwhelmingly approved by voters at this year’s annual town meeting in March, will likely reappear on the 2019 town meeting warrant.

In public meetings leading up to this year’s meeting, Chief Cochran noted that the town has been considering an addition since 2006. The original building was erected in 1974 and has had limited improvements since that.

Right now, the building doesn’t comply with National Fire Protection Association Standards and doesn’t meet the department’s needs, Cochrane said.

The proposed 30-by-45 square-foot single story addition, which would be constructed on the Route 114 side of the building, would provide needed office space, room for gear storage, an equipment storage bay, an updated kitchen and updated restrooms, the chief explained last week.

“There will be a larger meeting-training room because we’ve outgrown the meeting room that we have now,” he said. “And the bathroom will be with showers, so they’re be more locker-room style.”

The new space will also provide sufficient room for the emergency operations center, according to the chief.

Cochrane said he hopes to have a clearer idea about how to move forward with the addition project some time this month.

This story originally appeared in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in Sutton, New Hampshire, on Tuesday, September 11, 2018.

Lawsuit against Bradford, employees could take some time

PHOTO: The former Candlelight Inn in Bradford village has reopened as the Bradford Village Inn, but it cannot operate legally as a lodging establishment until a lawsuit filed by the owner against the town is resolved. (Ray Carbone/photo)

By Ray Carbone

BRADFORD – A local innkeeper’s lawsuit against the town and two local officials may not be resolved for more than a year, according to documents filed in the U.S. District Court in Concord.

In March, Joseph Torro, the owner of the historic Bradford Country Inn on Greenhouse Lane, sued the Town of Bradford, as well as Mark Goldberg, chief of the fire-rescue department, and Marilyn Gordon, the town treasurer, for allegedly conspiring against his efforts to re-open the 121-year-old lodging facility after he purchased in August 2014. Court papers filed in July indicate that a jury trial would likely last about three or four days’ but a tentative start date is still about one year away, on August 20, 1019.

In separate documents, both (employees) deny all charges of illegal or improper behavior.

Earlier this month, Judge Andrea K. Johnstone, who is presiding over the case, asked the two sides to consider mediation to resolve their dispute. “By April 1, 2019, the parties shall inform the court whether they intend to mediate,” she wrote.

Rick Lehmann, the attorney representing Torro, said he’s preparing for a trial by jury but he’s open to discussions with lawyers representing the other sides. “If they want to talk, we’ll talk,” he said.

Torro claims that Goldberg and Gordon, who were romantically involved, used their political influence to create unfair roadblocks to operating the lodging business, including conspiring with the selectmen to withhold property tax abatements and trying to unfairly enforce fire safety/safety codes. He’s asking for $2 million in monetary damages as well as an indeterminate amount of punitive damages.

In court paperwork filed earlier this summer, the attorneys representing the town and the two employees disputed the innkeeper’s claims.

In separate documents, both Goldberg and Gordon deny all charges of illegal or improper behavior.

“(Goldberg) denies that he attempted to destroy (Torro’s) business prospect,” the fire chief’s document reads. “(Goldberg) notes that he never ran the Candlelight Inn (the former name of the property),” as charged by the current property owner.

In her court response, Gordon refutes Torro’s claim that she had to sell the Candlelight Inn because she was not a successful business owner, and that she and Goldberg wanted Torro to also fail in the hopes of her eventually regaining the property.

In the town’s court paperwork, officials deny that their employees treated Torro differently than other property owners regarding his request for a fire permit and tax abatements. “The abatement application could not be granted for the 2014 tax year because the application was filed too late,” the town attorneys claim. “An abatement could not be granted (for the 2015 tax year) because the application was submitted too early.”

The town’s legal response also questions Torro’s arguments regarding the reasons for any alleged unfair treatment by Goldberg and Gordon. “While the town notes that it lacks information regarding the alleged subjective motivation of Goldberg and Gordon describe, it disputes the characterization of their actions as well was (Torro’s) allegation that there was a conspiracy, discrimination and/or abuse of government power and influence.”

This story first ran in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in Sutton, New Hampshire, on August 28, 2018.

Nothing new on this New Hampshire lake – every 5 years

By Ray Carbone

SUTTON – Sometime next month, Bruce Ellsworth will head out to the ancient dam at the southern end of Blaisdell Lake and remove a few boards to allow the water to rush through a little more rapidly. Then in early December, he’ll go back and reinstall the boards, significantly dropping the flow of water.

It’s a task that Ellsworth has been doing for about 40 years now. Every five years, the dam is opened up to allow the 153-acre lake level to drop about 4½-feet. That allows the 80-plus property owners on the lake the opportunity to do any deck or other lakefront work they need.

But before that happens, state regulations require a public hearing before the board of selectmen. That hearing was held last month, and no one who was not required to be there attended, Ellsworth reported.

He wasn’t surprised.

“I’ve been doing this for more than 40 years and never had anyone shown up,” he said.

Blaisdell Lake in South Sutton is what Ellsworth calls a “family lake.”

‘My great, great-grandfather had a place here in 1900. Before that, I don’t know.’

Bruce Ellswoth, Sutton resident

“It’s a very quiet lake,” he explained. “There are family activities but we’re not a society-driven (community)… There are many, many families that have been here for generations. It’s not unusual for one generations of families to return here and take over (the property) for the previous one.”

Ellsworth has never had to do that because his family has been on Blaisdell for more than 100 years, he said. “My folks built a camp here in 1936 but I was born here in 1938,” he said. “And my great, great-grandfather had a place here in 1900. Before that, I don’t know.”

The 80-year-old resident also doesn’t know when the dam was built. “It’s a stone dam with a concrete face,” he explained. “I know it goes back to the 1800s. Its purpose at one time was to maintain a good level, just like now.

“But Blaisdell Lake was only about half the size it is today. The southern part was called Great Pond, and it was a naturally formed lake, he added. “Than, probably, with the dam it grew to its current size. But, I don’t know for sure.”

Back in 1950, the Blaisdell Lake Property Owners Association, now called the Blaisdell Lake Protective Association, was formed. “And that was the result of the fact that the dam was in disrepair and it was causing some pretty significant changes in the elevation of the lake, depending on the weather,” Ellsworth said. “So, one of our bylaws was to maintain the dam because it was a concern of all the residents to maintain a stable level.”

The drawdown also allows the association to do needed maintenance on the dam, he noted. “We’ve found that pressure washing every five years and adding a protective coating is a good preventative maintenance,” he said. “It costs about $7,000. And it’s the most expensive item we have in our budget.”

Today, state laws require that the association work with the NH Department of Environmental Services to insure that the dam’s maintenance and lake operating plans are suitable to maintain Blaisdell’s ecological health. And as part of that responsibility, there is a public hearing before the drawdown every five years.

So, it’s held, even if no one shows up.

This story first appeared in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in Sutton, New Hampshire, on Tuesday, August 7, 2018.

 

 

Warner voters will discuss land and rail trail at town meeting

This photograph of the town-owned land at 136 E. Main Street, taken by Tim Blagden, president of the Concord-Lake Sunapee Rail Trail this past winter. Blagden said it indicates how much of the property  can sometimes be flooded. (Courtesy.)

By Ray Carbone

WARNER – Town residents will have the opportunity to voice their opinions concerning the future of a 3.13-acre town-owned lot, now that the Friends of the Concord-Lake Sunapee Rail Trail have expressed an interest in it.

The town originally purchased the property at 136 East Main Street in 2016 for $75,000 as a potential site for a new fire department stationhouse. The site was later rejected for several reasons, including the fact that it’s vulnerable to seasonal flooding, said Jim Bingham, the town’s administrator. “It borders on the Warner River and a significant amount of that land is within the flood plain. That area’s been flooded more than once, and some of that has been recently.”

‘Do we drop the (land) price significantly for the rail trail people to buy it? Or do we give it to them? Or do we hold to it and give them an easement?”

Selectman Kinberley Edelmann

 

At the annual town meeting the following year, residents gave the selectboard clear directions about the property, according to Kimberley Edelmann, the board’s chair. “The instructions were, get our money back,” she recalled.

Now two years later, the vacant lot remains unsold and local realtors estimate that its value has decreased significantly from the original $75,000 asking price, Bingham said. (The annual town report lists the property’s value at $68,070.)

Meanwhile, proponents of the rail trail and others interested in local conservation and recreation have come to town leaders with proposals about a variety of ideas including the development a dog park, a new car-top/carry-in boat launch, and developing space for bocce and croquet players.

“So the question is, do we renew the listing, given the fact that it’s likely to go for a much lower price,” Bingham asked rhetorically. “Or, maybe it’s of more value to the town down the road for potential recreational uses and possibly furthering the economy.”

The Concord-Lake Sunapee Rail Trail is a nonprofit organization based in Warner that hopes to develop a 34-mile walkway/bikeway along the old Concord-Claremont Railroad line. The user-friendly project would connect the towns of Newbury (at the southern tip of Sunapee), Bradford, Sutton, Warner and Hopkinton/Contoocook to the state capital. Supporters say that facilities like the rail trail can improve both a community’s overall health and its economic vitality.

Tim Blagden, president of the organization’s board, said that one of the project’s biggest challenges is acquiring the needed land and/or property easements to construct the trail. Unlike what’s occurred in other areas of New Hampshire, the state never purchased the Concord-Claremont railroad bed so Blagden and his supporters must move through the proposed trail section by section, talking to private landowners, state agencies and local municipalities, to secure easements or purchase property. (About half of the proposed new trail project would include already developed trails like Warner’s rail trail, and the recently approved three-quarters trail between the Appleseed Restaurant and the Pizza Chef plaza in Bradford.)

The town-owned lot is an important link for completing the local trail, Blagden said, because it would eventually help connect the old rail bed from one side of Interstate 89 to the other.

“The railroad grade is on the front of that lot, on the street side – close to Route 103,” he explained. “It’s maybe 40-to-50 feet off the street pavement… We usually ask for a 30-foot wide path and the trail is about 14-feet wide. The extra space is for maybe a bench or a sign or just to trim the brush back… That would cover about 21,450 square feet. That’s just under half-an-acre, or just under 16-percent of the total lot space.”

The selectboard considered the question at its July 3 meeting, Edelmann reported.

“What the selectmen don’t know is how the citizens of Warner feel about the rail trail,” she said. “And what I want to know as chairman is, how much support does the town want the board of selectmen to give to the rail trail project.”

The answer to that will impact what the town does with the Main Street land, she noted. “Do we drop the price significantly for the rail trail people to buy it? Or do we give it to them? Or, do we hold to it and give them an easement?”

The level of support could also help town leaders understand issues related to development in the areas around I-89’s exit 9, and in the Waterloo section of town, Edelmann explained.

On July 3, the selectmen decided to not relist the East Main Street land for the moment and to bring the issue to the annual town meeting in March.

This story first appeared in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in North Sutton, New Hampshire, on July 24, 2018.

Local town administrators looking for ways to cut costs, expand services

By Ray Carbone

BRADFORD – Two years ago the town administrators from Bradford, Sutton and Warner got together to see if they could save their towns some money when the time came around to make their annual winter fuel purchases.

“Instead of Bradford buying 5,000 gallons, Sutton buying something like its 5,000 gallons and Warner buying its 10,000 or whatever, we did a joint fuel bid,” recalled Karen Hambleton, Bradford’s town administrator. “And we got a great rate.”

The administrative trio was so encouraged by the results they’re now meeting on a regular basis, exploring ways their towns can work together for their mutual benefit.

“For the past year the towns of Sutton, Bradford and Warner have had conversations about consolidating certain services, either for expanding services or because it would be more cost effective,” explained Elly Phillips, Sutton’s town administrator.

“I think there’s a lot of cool opportunities to save money here and there, backing each other up, helping each other out,” agreed Hambleton.

For instance the regular joint administrators’ meeting has addressed the idea of buying or renting equipment together in the future, according to Jim Bingham, Warner’s administrator.

“Take roadside mowing. Each town needs to do it for a few weeks in the summer and we always rent a tractor,” he said. “But when you look at what the towns are spending, we could own one in six years for what we’re paying for a single year’s rental.”

If issues related to storage, maintenance costs, insurance etc. could be agreed to, the towns might consider making a joint tractor-mower purchase, he suggested.

The towns could even look at shared professional services, the administrators noted.

“I’m talking about things like code enforcement, building inspections, planning or even town administrators – which I hate to say,” Phillips said. “The times are changing, and these little towns need professionals.”

The novel approach could attract more qualified professionals than what a single small community can afford to pay, according to Bingham.

To some extent the shared services idea has already been done.

When Sutton voters elected a new town clerk in March, Bradford helped out by allowing residents in their neighboring community to register their vehicles in Bradford for a few weeks, while the new employee received her necessary training, Hambleton said.

Of course the town administrators can’t make any cooperative agreements by themselves.

Hambleton, Bingham and Phillips have to win the approval and support of their respective elected three-member select boards before any deals can move forward.

But the trio says the possible savings and service improvements are worth the time and effort to investigate.

“It’s just a matter of changing the way we think,” Hambleton said. “It’s just appropriate to have our towns working together.”

This story first appeared in the InterTown Record weekly newspaper, published in Sutton, New Hampshire, on Tuesday, June 26, 2018.

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑